Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Nicolas Sarkozy and the Libya Investigation: The Key Questions

Nicolas Sarkozy, former president of France, during his campaign to be named as the presidential candidate of the conservative party Les Républicains in 2016. He lost in the first round of the primaries.Credit...Ian Langsdon/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

PARIS — Nicolas Sarkozy, the flamboyant former French president who had hoped to revive his political career, is facing a formal investigation over allegations that his 2007 campaign received illegal funding from the Libyan strongman Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.

It is not certain that Mr. Sarkozy, who led France from 2007 to 2012 but failed to generate enough enthusiasm in his 2016 comeback bid, will stand trial. But the decision by investigators to pursue the case represents a significant step and means that a return to the political stage is even more unlikely for Mr. Sarkozy.

Mr. Sarkozy acknowledged as much on Thursday, saying in a television interview, “Politics, that’s over.”

Here are some answers to the central questions about the case.

After two days of questioning by the police, Mr. Sarkozy, 63, who has been the subject of several corruption inquiries, was formally charged with passive corruption, illegal campaign financing and misappropriation of Libyan public funds. (The charge of passive corruption applies to people suspected of receiving money or favors.)

The case was opened in 2013, after a 2012 report by the investigative news website Mediapart suggesting that Mr. Sarkozy’s campaign had received up to 50 million euros, or nearly $62 million at current exchange rates, from Colonel Qaddafi’s government.

Investigators have been proceeding slowly, and their inquiries had featured in the news only sporadically.

Image
Ziad Takieddine, a Franco-Lebanese businessman, has said he personally delivered millions in cash to the 2007 Sarkozy campaign. Mr. Sarkozy has called him “sinister” and “unbalanced.”Credit...Bertrand Guay/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The case files are sealed, and several of the Libyans said to have played a role are dead or exiled, making it hard to piece together a fully accurate picture of the investigation.

It involves a complex web of political and financial ties between Mr. Sarkozy’s advisers, officials who were part of Colonel Qaddafi’s government before he was ousted, and figures who played a murky role as intermediaries between the two as relations between France and Libya warmed up in the mid-2000s.

The accusations stem mostly from former Libyan officials and a Franco-Lebanese arms dealer named Ziad Takieddine, who acted as an intermediary and who says he personally delivered millions in cash. One official, a former oil minister for Colonel Qaddafi named Shukri Ghanem — whose body was found in the Danube in Vienna in 2012 — left behind documents that refer to payments made to Mr. Sarkozy in 2007.

The officials, and Mr. Takieddine, have given conflicting accounts about the sequence of events and the amounts of money involved. Some Libyan officials have even denied that Mr. Sarkozy’s campaign received any funding.

A report by investigators cited in the French news media appears to have established that Mr. Sarkozy’s 2007 campaign had unusual amounts of cash on hand — one of Mr. Sarkozy’s top aides rented a large bank vault during the campaign, ostensibly to store documents and speeches. But the sums mentioned were in the range of tens of thousands of euros, not millions.

Still, the fact that the French magistrates investigating the case have decided to place Mr. Sarkozy under formal investigation suggests they that there is evidence of potential wrongdoing, even if the exact scope and nature remain unclear.

Image
In 2007, Mr. Sarkozy met with Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, then Libya’s leader, during a visit to Tripoli. France, under Mr. Sarkozy’s leadership, later played a leading role in the NATO intervention that helped topple Colonel Qaddafi’s government.Credit...Pascal Rossignol/Reuters

Mr. Sarkozy has continually and strenuously denied the accusations, calling them “grotesque.” In a Thursday night interview on the French television channel TF1, he said that he had “never betrayed the trust” of the French people.

“There is not one document, not one picture, not one account, not one piece of material proof. There is only hatred, mud, mediocrity, malevolence and slander.” — Mr. Sarkozy, in an interview with French television.

He called Mr. Takieddine “sinister” and “unbalanced.” Noting that many of the accusations came from former Libyan officials, Mr. Sarkozy disparaged Colonel Qaddafi and his aides as “assassins” and “criminals” who could not be trusted.

He argued that the accusations were driven by a desire by allies of Colonel Qaddafi to seek revenge against Mr. Sarkozy. France, under his leadership, played a prominent role in the NATO-led campaign of airstrikes that ultimately led to the toppling of Colonel Qaddafi and his death at the hands of Libyan rebels in 2011.

In France, complex criminal cases are handled by special magistrates with broad investigative powers, who place defendants under formal investigation when they believe the evidence points to serious wrongdoing.

This means that the investigation will continue for several months, if not longer. Mr. Sarkozy’s conduct will be restricted as the magistrates do their work — a first for a former president in recent French history.

He has been forbidden to meet with several people of interest in the case, including two close allies who have also come under scrutiny, and he is barred from traveling to a handful of countries, including Libya. Mr. Sarkozy’s lawyer said on Friday that he would appeal the restrictions.

But Mr. Sarkozy will not necessarily stand trial when the investigation ends. The magistrates can drop the charges if they do not believe the evidence is sufficient to proceed. Even if the judges order Mr. Sarkozy to stand trial, he can still appeal the decision.

Mr. Sarkozy has been dogged by accusations of financial impropriety since he left the presidency. That has hampered his ability to make a political comeback, despite his popularity with the base of his party.

He has been ordered to stand trial in two other cases. In the first, involving his 2012 campaign, he has been charged with exceeding strict limits on campaign spending. In the second, he is accused of trying to obtain confidential information from a court judge.

Other cases against Mr. Sarkozy have been dropped, including one in which we was accused of manipulating the heiress to the L’Oréal fortune into financing his 2007 campaign.

Follow Aurelien Breeden on Twitter: @aurelienbrd.

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 7 of the New York edition with the headline: Sarkozy and Libya Ties: Key Questions in Inquiry. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT